China and Causality

The New York Times has a fascinating story about an apparent general glut in China.  Inventories are skyrocketing and production orders are being cancelled left and right.  Which of the following theories is most appropriate to the situation?

  • Such a situation is impossible.
  • Excessive savings and underconsumption have caused disastrous lack of demand, which can be remedied by government spending.
  • Overinvestment in infrastructure creates diminishing returns to capital investment, in turn causing a collapse of investment and thus of demand and ultimately a severe crisis.
  • Excessive credit in the economy has created overinvestment in ultimately worthless enterprises and infrastructure, which can ultimately only be resolved by a purging of excess goods and capacity.
A number of these seem plausible, but much as I hate to say it the last seems the most likely to apply to the case of China.  Just a reminder that the complexity of the actual world admits a multiplicity of potential explanations.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: